TO:
Town Council
FROM: Finance & Budget Committee
DATE:
April 20, 2009
SUBJECT:
Recommended Changes to the Town Manager’s Proposed Budget for FY 2010
Outlined
below are recommended changes and the resulting impact of these changes on the
Town Manager’s proposed budget for FY 2010 for consideration at our meeting on
Thursday, April 23, 2009. This budget:
ü
Reduces spending
for the school, town and capital budgets
ü
Requires existing
taxpayers to pay 1.5% more in property taxes
1. Town Manager’s Proposed Budget
The
budget proposed by the Town Manager on March 10, 2009 totaled $216,674,205 and
included the Superintendent of School’s recommended budget to the Board of
Education. The proposed town budget decreased by $49,286 from
the current fiscal year budget and the capital financing budget declined as
well by $3,814. The recommended school budget
increased by $3,543,300 or 2.9% for a total net budget increase of $3,490,200.
The recommended budget reflected a loss of $5,984,747 in revenues. The spending
increase and the loss of revenues required a $9,474,947 increase in the current
year property tax levy (5.3%). A 1% change in the property tax levy requires
budget adjustments of $1,774,042.
2. Board of Education Adopted Budget
It
is assumed that the Board of Education will adopt a budget tomorrow night for
FY 2010 with a slight decrease in spending from the current fiscal year. The
elimination of the proposed budget increase for the school budget will reduce
the increase in the required property tax levy by $3,547,117. The increase in
the property tax levy would be reduced from 5.3% to 3.3% for FY 2010.
3. Town Union Concessions
The
Town Manager’s proposed FY 2010 budget reflected $1,200,000 in wage concessions
or employment reductions from the Town’s unions. Since it was unknown at the
time of submitting the proposed budget how this $1.2 million in savings would
be achieved, it was reflected as a negative adjustment in the proposed budget.
In adopting the proposed budget for FY 2010, this adjustment must now be
reflected in individual departmental line items to produce a balanced budget
for FY 2010. Since tentative agreements with most of the bargaining units on a
wage freeze for FY 2010 have been reached, revisions to the proposed budget are
being made to reflect this wage freeze within individual departmental line
items.
The
following is a summary of the concessions by union that will be reflected in
individual line items in the Town Council’s adopted budget:
Union Amount of Concessions
Fire $253,033
Police $329,316
SEIU $359,131
AFSCME $ 55,073
Social Security $ 40,131
TOTAL
$1,036,684
After
union concessions are factored into the FY 2010 budget, there remains $163,316
in adjustments required to achieve the proposed budget assumption of
$1,200,000. Two additional adjustments are recommended to achieve the $1.2
million adjustment:
·
Incorporate the
hiring freeze policy option outlined in the Town Manager’s proposed budget
($100,000). This adjustment to salary accounts reflects the continuation of the
existing hiring freeze through FY 2010.
·
Since the
proposed budget was submitted, one full-time employee in the Zoning Office has
filed for retirement. Not filling this position will save $63,316 in the adopted
FY 2010 budget.
4. Additional Adjustments
A
total of $900,000 in adjustments is required to reduce the increase in the
current year property tax levy from 3.3% to 2.8%. The following is a list of
adjustments to achieve the $900,000.
·
Increase revenue
from operating transfers in by $29,600 to reflect one-half of a building
inspector position that has been allocated to the capital projects activity and
eligible for reimbursement from the Capital Projects Fund.
·
Reduce membership
in the Capital Region Council of Governments by $1,000 reflecting their revised
budget for FY 2010 which eliminated any increase.
·
Reduce the risk
management budget by $10,000 reflecting the reduction of 30 vehicles from the
inventory of rolling stock and resulting savings on the insured and
self-insured programs.
·
A review of the
contribution to the retiree health care reserve fund for FY 2010 indicated that
the budgeted contribution by the Town and the Public Schools was $357,500
higher than the amount anticipated in the long term funding plan for the
reserve in FY 2010. Appropriating an amount consistent with the long-term plan
would reduce the Town budget by $127,500 for FY 2010.
·
Implement the
Fire inspection services fee proposal outlined in the budget options section of
the Town Manager’s proposed budget. This would reflect a partial year of
revenues under the program for the first year of $225,000 partially offset by
an additional $25,000 in temporary payroll and operating expenses to administer
the program.
·
Reduce the revaluation
litigation account by $25,000 reflecting the reduced number of tax appeals that
have been filed this year.
·
Reduce utility
expenses by $100,000 reflecting additional facilities switched to the new
TransCanada contract for electricity and projected reduced consumption.
·
Increase the
assumption on property tax collections from 98.8% to 98.85% based on current
year collections experience generating an additional $90,000 in revenue.
·
Reduce the debt
service appropriation by $60,000 reflecting an interest rate assumption on the
July bond sale of 4% rather than 4.8% based upon existing interest rates and
our borrowing experience.
·
Reduce the cost
of living assumption for the refuse and recycling contract from 3% to 1.75%
reflecting current CPI data ($30,000).
·
Reduce the
assumption regarding the paramedic contract cost and contract performance
penalties ($26,900).
·
Eliminating free
parking on Sundays in the surface lots in the Town Center generates additional
revenue of $106,000 in the Parking Lot Fund to be used to fund eligible
expenses currently being financed by the General Fund.
·
Eliminating free
refuse and recycling collection for religious and non-profit schools and
organizations reduces contractor collection and disposal costs by $94,000.
5. Summary of Adopted Budget
REVENUES
·
Non-property tax
revenues are projected to decline by $5,640,147 (16%) in FY2010. This decline is primarily due to the
recession and includes a reduction in state revenue, interest income, building
permits, conveyance taxes, fund balance, sale of assets and transfers from
other funds.
FY 2009 FY 2010 Reduction
State
Revenue $21,437,663 $20,169,649
($1,268,014)
Building Permits 1,575,000 800,000 (775,000)
CRRA
Settlement Revenue 400,000 300,000
(100,000)
Interest
Income 2,370,000 1,500,000
(870,000)
Sale
of Assets 679,000 0
(679,000)
Use
of Fund Balance 781,185 0 (781,185)
Premium
from Bond Sale 192,200 0
(192,200)
Transfer
from CNRE Fund 670,000 0 (670,000)
Real
Estate Transaction Fees 1,300,000 1,105,000
(195,000)
Motor
Vehicle Supplement Tax 1,700,000 1,550,000
(150,000)
Recycling
Rebate 70,000
0 (70,000)
Parking
Violations 425,000 360,000 (65,000)
Other
Non-Tax Revenue
4,179,741 4,354,993 175,252
TOTAL $35,779,789 $30,139,642
($5,640,147)
EXPENDITURES
·
Expenditures for
the town, school and capital budgets all reflect a decrease in spending from
the budget for the current fiscal year. Total
spending is down $612,317.
|
Adopted Budget Summary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
Increase/ |
Percent |
|
|
Adopted |
Adopted |
(Decrease) |
Change |
|
Town |
$ 73,828,887 |
$ 73,284,201
|
$ (544,686) |
-0.7% |
|
Schools |
$123,310,140 |
$123,306,323 |
$ (3,817) |
-0.0% |
|
Capital Financing |
$ 16,044,978 |
$ 15,981,164
|
$ (63,814) |
-0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expenditures |
$213,184,005 |
$212,571,688 |
$ (612,317) |
-0.3% |
·
The capital
budget has been cut by $14.1 million in FY 2010 and $11.3 million in FY 2011.
TAXES
·
The significant
reduction is non-property tax revenue results in a need to increase property
taxes by $5.0 million or 2.8%, despite the significant reduction in
expenditures.
·
The FY2010 grand
list, the town’s tax base, has increased by $70 million due to commercial and
residential expansion. This growth will
generate an additional $2.4 million of the $5.0 million needed.
·
The existing tax
base, current taxpayers, would be required to pay 1.5% more in property tax
revenues next year as a result of this adopted budget.
·
The continued
phase-in of the state mandated property revaluation will result in taxpayers
having property tax adjustments above and below 1.5%. Without the mandated revaluation phase-in
every taxpayer would have experience a 1.5% tax increase.
6. Adopted Budget Reflects Public Expectations
·
We began to
identify means to reduce spending in both the FY2009 and FY2010 budgets as
early as August, 2008 in an effort to respond to the rapidly changing economic
conditions. By the end of the first
quarter of the fiscal year the budget for FY2009 was projected to be in deficit
by $1.8 million.
·
We implemented a hiring
freeze, a travel restriction, and restriction on nonessential spending and
eliminated 15 full-time positions.
·
We scrutinized
all spending and appropriation requests to evaluate the need.
·
The projected
$1.8 million projected deficit was reduced to zero.
·
Nonunion
employees’ and part time workers’ pay was frozen.
·
Negotiations with
town’s unions resulted in tentative union concessions for a wage freeze or
deferral.
·
We substantially
reduced capital budget for FY2009, FY2010 and FY2011, once in the fall and
again with the proposed budget.
Investments that reduced operating costs were given priority.
·
We worked to preserve
those services which enhance property value and attract residents to the community.