More
spending doesn’t equate to better schools.
There are studies that prove that.
The Report Card on American Education makes a
state-by-state analysis grading each state using over a hundred measures of
educational resources and achievement. Historical data
are presented when available and appropriate for three benchmark school years:
1985-86, 1995-96, and 2005-06. In addition, for several of the key measures of
educational inputs, historical data for 2000-01 have been provided in order to
examine more recent trends in educational spending. The report makes a
sobering statement:
“The
2007 Report Card once again illustrates
that simply increasing spending on education is not enough to improve student
performance. The information, analysis, and measurements in this report confirm
there is no evident correlation between pupil-to-teacher ratios, spending per
pupil, and teacher salaries on the one hand, and educational achievement as
measured by various standardized test scores, on the other. In other words,
lawmakers need to consider the fact that they cannot spend their way to
improved student achievement and must look beyond these conventional measures
of educational investment to find the keys to educational excellence.” (page 3)
Interestingly, a
report by a British think tank, Standards and Spending Dispelling the
Spending Orthodoxy, also concludes: "Not only is there no positive correlation
between spending and results, but there are quite a few negative correlations.
It's true that pupils from England and America score high on self-esteem, but the
two countries can't compete with other developed nations when it comes to
standardized tests."46
Our
school budget is proposed $125.5 million. In
Here
are some interesting statistics and rankings from School Digger.com which
compares schools from around the state based on test scores.
Here are CT school rankings === http://www.schooldigger.com/go/CT/schoolrank.aspx?pagetype=top10
Out
of 489 + elementary schools in CT -
In
fact the first
Bugbee
coming in 25th the next is
Norfeldt
coming in at 78th,
Morley
at 82nd ,
Aiken
at 118th,
Whiting
Lane and Wolcott at 137th (tie),
Duffy
at 160th,
Smith
at 285 and
Charter
Oak is 344th,
Braeburn
wasn't ranked
of CT middle schools (based on CMT scores)
Out of 135+ schools -
King
Philip and Sedgewick both ranked 42nd,
Bristow
is ranked 59th
of CT high schools (based on CAPT scores)
Out of 167+-
Hall
is ranked 26th
Conard is
ranked 57th
=============================================================
District Profile: School digger shows this:
http://www.schooldigger.com/go/CT/district/04920/search.aspx
Grades
offered: PK-12
28
South Main Street
West
Hartford, CT 06107-2447
(860)
523-3500
Students: 9988
Elementary
Schools: 10
Middle
Schools: 3
High
Schools: 2
Schooldigger Connecticut District Ranking for West
Hartford: 69th (of 182 districts)
see district
rank -
http://www.schooldigger.com/go/CT/districtrank.aspx
========================================================
http://www.schooldigger.com/go/CT/districtrank.aspx
Here are the top 10 school districts in the state according to School Digger
which uses test scores and other factors
1 Simsbury
School District
2 Regional School District 09
3 New Canaan School District
4 Wilton School District
5 Westport School District
6 Avon School District
7 Weston School District
8 Farmington School District
9 Granby School District
10 Darien School District
According
to CT State DOE per pupil expenditures report Nov 2007, the
top ten school districts spend this amount per pupil in 2006-07
1 Simsbury School District -
$11,222.03
2 Regional School District 09 - $16,028.31
3 New Canaan School District - $14,837.13
4 Wilton School District -
$13,395.51
5 Westport School District - $14,720.11
6 Avon School District -
$10,301.10
7 Weston School District -
$15,286.16
8 Farmington School District - $11,338.04
9 Granby School District -
$10,445.91
10 Darien School District - $12,909.29
School
districts spending the most money per pupil are:
|
|
DISTRICT NO. 11 |
18,148.04 |
Ranked 135 |
|
|
|
17,357.06 |
Ranked 47 |
|
|
|
16,984.24 |
Ranked 26 |
|
|
|
16,776.61 |
Ranked 36 |
|
|
DISTRICT NO. 1 |
16,504.93 |
Ranked 92 |
|
|
|
16,488.67 |
Ranked 100 |
|
|
CHAPLIN |
16,258.48 |
Ranked 158 |
|
|
DISTRICT NO. 12 |
16,229.34 |
Ranked 49 |
|
|
DISTRICT NO. 9 |
16,028.38 |
Ranked 2 |
|
|
|
15,920.16 |
Ranked 28 |
|
|
|
15,814.42 |
Ranked 72 |
|
|
|
15,448.13 |
Ranked 179 |
|
|
WESTON |
15,286.16 |
Ranked 7 |
|
|
DISTRICT NO. 18 |
15,175.50 |
Not Ranked |
|
|
NEW HAVEN |
15,044.18 |
Ranked 171 |
So
clearly – spending more money does not necessarily translate into better scores
or schools (their rankings are in the third column above out of 182
schools).
It
would seem that an efficiently run school district is one where per pupil
expenditure is keep lower and scores and rankings are higher as evident in
Avon, Granby and Farmington (among the top 10 school districts in the state). With West Hartford ranking 69th
and spending $11,030 per pupil, clearly we can do better. What are our
surrounding towns doing better that we should examine?